Planned Parenthood Sues to Overturn Wisconsin Abortion Laws
Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin filed suit against state officials on September 10, 2026, in Dane County Circuit Court, seeking to strike down two of the state's longest-standing abortion safeguards: the twenty-four-hour waiting period required before an abortion, and the law limiting who may perform one to a licensed physician. The case, Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin v. Ozanne, names Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne among the state officials being sued.

Planned Parenthood's lawyers argue both statutes violate liberty and equal-protection guarantees written into the Wisconsin Constitution, and that neither law serves any real medical purpose. The organization continues to perform abortions across its Wisconsin clinics while the suit proceeds.

The Wisconsin Catholic Conference, the public-policy voice of the state's Catholic bishops, answered on the same day the suit was filed. "These commonsense laws provide critical protection and medical safeguards for Wisconsin's women and their children," the conference said in a statement, adding that the lawsuit "aims to eliminate these laws not for patient safety, but for profit and expediency."

The filing follows years of legal back-and-forth in Wisconsin over what the state's abortion statutes actually require, with both sides returning again and again to the same courthouse doors, each time asking a judge to say what an unborn child is owed, and what a mother is owed, and whether either debt can be waived by statute.

A waiting period is a strange thing to sue over. Twenty-four hours is not a wall; it is a pause, a chance for a woman facing the hardest decision of her life to sit still long enough to hear her own heart before she acts on someone else's timetable. Strike that pause away, and what is lost is not efficiency gained but simply time — the very thing a frightened woman most needs and is least given.

The deeper claim in the lawsuit is the older one, dressed up in the language of liberty: that what grows in the womb is not yet a matter for anyone's protection, not the state's, not the doctor's, not God's. Scripture has never allowed that claim to stand unanswered.

"For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb." (Psalm 139:13)

The Psalmist did not write that of himself as a grown man looking back with sentiment. He wrote it of himself while yet unformed, already known, already covered, already the handiwork of God before any physician had laid eyes on him. The Bible never once speaks of the child in the womb as a question mark. It speaks of him as a person, already loved, already numbered.

"Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward." (Psalm 127:3)

My friend, no court in Dane County or anywhere else has the authority to reclassify what the Lord has already named. A legislature can repeal a waiting period. It cannot repeal the truth that every child in every womb in Wisconsin was covered by God's own hand before the first attorney ever filed a brief. The safeguards under challenge are modest, hedges built low around a field that deserves a wall. Wisconsin's bishops are right to say so plainly, and right to say it without malice toward the women these laws are meant to protect.

The gospel does not ask you to win this argument in a courtroom. It asks something harder and something better: that you receive the truth about the unborn as God has spoken it, and that you extend to every frightened woman walking into a clinic the same mercy Christ extends to sinners — not condemnation first, but truth spoken in love, and a door held open toward life.